August 1, 2009
One of the best parts about working in a remote hospital is the opportunity to rub elbows with people who are doing work that would normally isolate them in some dank office downtown.
One of our physicians, Dr. M, is a young man with cerebral palsy. His spasticity prevents him from getting a license to do family practice in other states, even though it's pretty well controlled with a spinal shunt that infuses medication to help relax his muscles. He does not want to make the Arctic his permanent home, so he decided to become a forensic expert in child abuse. He'll start his 3-year residency next summer. In the meantime he'll continue to provide expert testimony on cases of adult assault and abuse of children here.
I thought I should take advantage of Dr. M's expertise while I could, since sexual abuse and domestic assault are so pervasive here. Alaska has six times more child abuse than the lower 48 and here in the Northwest Arctic Borough, the highest rate in the state. I was spoiled while working in Minnesota as St.Paul has the world-class Midwest Children's Resource Center, where I referred all suspected cases of childhood sexual abuse during my 20 years of practice there.
Although I feel the need to be more knowledgeable because I am working on the front line here, the basic practice rule stays the same: if the story sounds plausible, the nonspecialist like me needs to send the victim right on to the child abuse specialist because of the chance of contaminating the story by leading the victim. A clinician's innocent blunder can ruin a court case. As Dr. M explained to me, there are volumes written about how to extract the story and analyze the physical evidence in order to elicit the truth about what happened. Generalists don't make time to study those tomes. Except maybe the most curious or perverse practitioners. Seven percent of doctors are psychopaths, so who knows what they study in their spare time.
Dr. M was preparing expert testimony for a trial the following day and invited me to join him as he made a last pass through the evidence. This case involved an adult instead of a child, but I was eager to learn more about the physical manifestations of assault as it would help me hone my powers of observation during routine exams. Well-practiced medicine is after all a matter of astute sleuthing.
Dr. M read me the report he wrote based on the interview of a young woman who was strangled to the point of lost consciousness and then raped. The accused is up for rape and attempted murder charges. He proceeded to show me 180 pictures of her injuries as well as normal skin findings taken the night of her assault. He quizzed me as we went. I used my common sense but was sometimes clueless as to the signs he was showing me. The story is registered on the skin like the print on this page to those who can see.
Ninety-nine percent of rape here involves a woman who has lost all judgment and control from alcohol. I feel vindicated. Several of my female colleagues have told me it's unsafe to wander around town alone. So I can walk around town any time of day or night -- just as long as I'm sober.
We scan her arms. The paw prints on her arms are easy to decipher. The initial grab.
Two symmetrical bruises on the mid inner thigh? Cunnilingus. But which direction is he facing? Shouldn't his body be smothering her in case she wakes and resists? No, Dr. M says, the other way. He is stabilizing her legs with his thumbs to keep her from moving suddenly. Good hunch though, as women usually do come to during the rape.
When we get to the detailed photos of the vaginal area, I feel a comfortable sense of familiarity. During a pelvic exam there is a tendency to look comprehensively but briefly. Now I stare and study in a way that would be inappropriate with a live patient.
There is a vertical tear in the posterior fourchette, which is below the labia minora or inner lips. He tells me this is critical, classic evidence of forced entry. Like the cracked glass of the back door in a burglary.
He uses a colposcope, a microscope tailored to exploring human epithelial anatomy, to search the vagina for more evidence. Once, he tells me, he found a hair left by the perpetrator. This single piece of DNA-encripted evidence put the guy away for forty years.
We move up to the neck. There are bruises but not as impressive as I imagined they would be.
He had forced a kiss on her. She remembered that because it occurred before she had lost consciousness from strangulation. I made conjectures about the abrasions on her chin and lips and how his teeth or chin may have caused them. Dr. M appears at a loss at this point. He says, not too self-consciously, that he isn't much of an expert on kissing. I joke about my own knowledge and proclivities. What a strange moment, talking to this sweet, spastic, drooling man, who is 25 years my junior, about our respective experiences and acumen in the area of kissing.
Now we come to the most crucial piece of evidence. It is a centimeter-long superficial laceration along the jaw line. He asks me about its significance. I squint, cock my head and shrug. Jubilantly, as only Dr. M can be, with his infectious laugh that lasts just a beat too long due to his spasticity, he says, "Self-inflicted from her own fingernail, it proves that she was trying to pry his hands away from her neck as he was strangling her." They weren't playing a sexual game of asphyxiation as the defense will surely suggest.
We are just wrapping it up with a few pictures from inside her mouth when Dr. M points excitedly at something he missed before. There are petechiae (minute exploded blood vessels) on the inside cheek -- evidence of prolonged strangulation. This will help support the attempted murder plea because it suggests a greater degree of asphyxiation indicating an intent to do serious harm. This is important, he explains, because this is this perp's fourth victim in a town of 3500 people.
Although Dr. M assures me his job is "one hundred percent non-biased" as an expert witness, he wasn't exactly exuding neutrality at this moment, or throughout the examination. Instead I saw passion, and mission, and utmost seriousness. I can't help but think that all the childhood punishment he must have received for being a weird-looking spastic boy had to have made its mark on him. And what a functional if arduous way to get back at the dark side of human behavior.
